Agilent 6460 LC/MS Application Note: Trichothecenes and Zearalenone Analysis in Wheat

This article introduces two methods for detecting toxins in wheat using different sample preparation methods, a modified QuEChERS method and the Agilent Bond Elut mycotoxin SPE method. The results showed that both methods can effectively detect toxins in wheat, but the modified QuEChERS method is faster and uses less solvent and sorbent.


Agilent 6460 LC/MS Application Note: Trichothecenes and Zearalenone Analysis in Wheat - cover page
Brand
Agilent
Document type
Application Note
Language
English
Pages
8
File format
PDF
File size
123 KB
Published
11 June, 2012
Updated
30 September, 2023
MD5 checksum
D1BAA878E306EDC1EA25099256D9D444

About this manual

The document evaluates two sample preparation procedures—modified QuEChERS extraction with dispersive SPE (d-SPE) and acetonitrile/water extraction with Bond Elut Mycotoxin SPE cartridges—for determining nine trichothecenes and zearalenone in wheat. The study aims to demonstrate that these methods, when combined with the Agilent 6460 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS, can reduce analysis costs while maintaining sensitivity commensurate with regulatory requirements.

Results indicate excellent linearity (R2 = 0.995) for all mycotoxins using both approaches. While the Bond Elut Mycotoxin SPE cartridge produced cleaner extracts with slightly improved limits of detection and quantification, the modified QuEChERS method was found to be substantially quicker and utilized significantly less solvent and sorbent.

What's inside

  • Introduction
  • Methods and Results
  • Sample Preparation Steps
  • HPLC Conditions
  • MS/MS Conditions
  • Calibration Curves
  • Recovery Data Comparison
  • Limits of Detection

Specifications

Instrument ModelAgilent 6460 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS
Column TypeAgilent ZORBAX Rapid Resolution HT Eclipse Plus C18, 2.1 x 100 mm, 1.8 um
Flow Rate0.28 mL/min
Column Temperature30 °C
Injection Volume10 uL
Linearity (R2)0.995

Frequently asked questions

Which sample preparation methods were compared in this study?

The document compares a modified QuEChERS extraction with dispersive SPE (d-SPE) and an acetonitrile/water extraction with Bond Elut Mycotoxin SPE cartridges.

What are the limits of detection for the BE Mycotoxin SPE method?

Using the BE Mycotoxin SPE method, the LODs ranged from 0.002 pg/kg (diacetoxyscirpenol) to 0.66 pg/kg (15-acetyl-deoxynivalenol).

How does the modified QuEChERS method compare in terms of speed and solvent usage?

The modified QuEChERS method is described as substantially quicker and uses much less solvent and sorbent compared to the Bond Elut Mycotoxin SPE method.

Download PDF (123 KB)

More Agilent Manuals


View all Agilent manuals →