Agilent Copy Number Analysis of Archival FFPE Tumor Samples by Oligo Array CGH Application Note

This application note describes a method for performing copy number analysis of archived FFPE tumor samples using Agilent Oligo Array CGH. The method uses Kreatech’s Universal Linkage System (ULS™) technology, a non-enzymatic direct labeling methodology, that can be used with degraded FFPE tissue-derived DNA. The method also features a simple, single-step sample preparation procedure, which reduces the cost of sample preparation. In addition, the method employs a novel labeling strategy that significantly improves the labeling efficiency of samples. Finally, the method is validated using a variety of FFPE tissue samples, and the results demonstrate that the method is capable of producing high-quality copy number data.


Agilent Copy Number Analysis of Archival FFPE Tumor Samples by Oligo Array CGH Application Note - cover page
Brand
Agilent
Category
Other
Document type
Application Note
Language
English
Pages
8
File format
PDF
File size
4.3 MB
Published
11 June, 2012
Updated
01 October, 2023
MD5 checksum
AD2032A32E75ABDB3AD48EC09807F239

About this manual

This document details a protocol for performing Copy Number Analysis on archival Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) tumor samples using Agilent's Oligo Array CGH platform. It addresses the challenges of analyzing degraded DNA from FFPE tissues, which often yield noisy data due to fragmentation and damage. The note introduces a non-enzymatic direct labeling method based on Kreatech's Universal Linkage System (ULS) technology.

What's inside

  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Materials and methods
  • De-Paraffinization
  • Results
  • ULS labeling mechanism

Specifications

Spatial Resolution~35 kb
Labeling Time30 minutes
Hybridization Time40 hours

Frequently asked questions

What labeling technology is used for FFPE samples in this protocol?

The protocol uses Kreatech's Universal Linkage System (ULS) technology, a non-enzymatic direct labeling methodology.

How does the ULS labeling method compare to enzymatic labeling?

Compared to enzymatic labeling, the ULS method is independent of fragment length, four times faster, contains fewer steps, and is easier to automate.

Download PDF (4.3 MB)

More Agilent Manuals


View all Agilent manuals →