Agilent G2350A GC-AED Compound-Independent Calibration Application Note

Empirical Formula Determinations and Compound-Independent Calibration Using a GC-AED System


Agilent G2350A GC-AED Compound-Independent Calibration Application Note - cover page
Brand
Agilent
Document type
Application Note
Language
English
Pages
8
File format
PDF
File size
204 KB
Published
03 July, 2012
Updated
01 October, 2023
Model
G2350A
MD5 checksum
ABEB69723E5753379BF986A5B5A0AEE3

About this manual

The document details a study verifying the compound-independent response of the second-generation Agilent G2350A GC-AED system. The system, consisting of an Agilent 6890 Series GC and AED ChemStation software, was tested using mixtures of organochlorine pesticides and other compounds to evaluate its ability to calculate elemental mole ratios (EMR) without specific analyte standards.

The study compared performance at different injection volumes (0.1 µL vs 1.0 µL) and split ratios. Results indicated that while the system generally produces accurate empirical formulas, response factor reproducibility is significantly better with 1.0 µL injections compared to 0.1 µL injections. The note also provides operating conditions for various elements and compares measured minimum detection limits against published specifications.

What's inside

  • Introduction
  • Experimental Conditions
  • Compound-Independent Calibration (CIC)
  • Response Factors (%RSD)
  • Elemental Mole Ratios (EMR)
  • Minimum Detection Limits (MDLs)

Frequently asked questions

Which injection volume showed better response factor reproducibility?

The data indicates that response factor reproducibility is better for 1.0 µL injections compared to 0.1 µL injections.

What was the largest error observed during EMR calculations?

The largest error was seen when calibrating on endosulfan sulfate due to a low area on the oxygen chromatogram.

Download PDF (204 KB)

More Agilent Manuals


View all Agilent manuals →